We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: [LF] Luthori First Amendments Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Luthori First
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 5415
Description[?]:
| We present following amendments as we consider these vital for Luthori |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the first trimester.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the first trimester.
Proposed: All abortions are illegal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The banking system.
Old value:: The government operates a central bank and all other banks are private.
Current: All banks are privately owned.
Proposed: The government operates and owns all banks.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding child benefit.
Old value:: Child benefit policies are left to local governments.
Current: Child benefit policies are left to local governments.
Proposed: The state guarantees child benefit to all families.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the pension system.
Old value:: There is a compulsory private pension system.
Current: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Proposed: The state does not operate a pension system. Individuals must save up for retirement on their own.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning religions.
Old value:: There is an official state religion, but membership is completely voluntary.
Current: There is an official state religion, but membership is completely voluntary.
Proposed: There is an official state religion, and membership is mandatory.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:38:01, December 27, 2023 CET | From | Liberal Party | To | Debating the [LF] Luthori First Amendments Bill |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, This bill is far too diverse with various differing topics. It would be nice if the member of the "Luthori First" party went on and made seperate bils based on a topic, instead of these long and diverse bills. |
| Date | 11:13:28, December 27, 2023 CET | From | Conservative Party (Nationalist) | To | Debating the [LF] Luthori First Amendments Bill |
| Message | (OOC: I think we should change the debate period law http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=697658 so that new players shouldn't be able to do long and diverse bills like this. Even if I like some articles, other articles go against the beliefs of my political party. If they really want to make their visibility higher, shouldn't they make multiple bills with each one being about the same topic? Then it would make things much less complicated.) |
| Date | 12:11:36, December 27, 2023 CET | From |  National Labour Party | To | Debating the [LF] Luthori First Amendments Bill |
| Message | OOC: I am agreeing with the CNP player here, I think that the section 2.3 of the bill, saying that new parties are not required to respect the section 2.2 of the same bill, saying that they should put different bills for each subjects, I think that should be abolished, as this is creating confusion to everyone. |
| Date | 15:23:33, December 27, 2023 CET | From | Labour Party - Left | To | Debating the [LF] Luthori First Amendments Bill |
| Message | OOC: I agree with that too |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 17 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 217 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 386 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "We're the first society in history with the option of living in a world without poverty. The fact poverty still exist says more about our political leaders than I can." - Clint Borgen |