We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Dranish Hosian Democrats[?]
This page contains information about the Dranish Hosian Democrats.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Kingdom of Great Bae (Dankuk)
Seats[?] in Senate of Great Bae[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Party Leaders: Luiz Sastre (3455-3470) Francis Indurain (3470-3485) Alejandro Gonzalez (3486-) From the Encylopædia Dranlandia: "The Dranish Hosian Democrats, or the DHD, is a centrist party from Santa Sharika with strong roots in the parts of Dranland which worships the Selucian Patriarchal Church. Founded by Luiz Sastre, a former Selucian(??) priest with a masters degree in theology and a bachelor in philosophy, as an outcry for the lack of morality and constant bickering about left or right in the Dranish political debate. It's opinions on the various political issues is a mix of socially liberal (when it comes to civil rights) and conservative (when it comes to morality and religion) values and a tendency to favor small over big government, but insisting on regulating big business. Adhering to the socio-economic philosophy of Distributism (http://classic.particracy.net/vieworganization.php?organizationid=2991) it favors the formation of small family owned businesses or worker-run cooperatives over traditional capitalist ownership of the means of production while at the same time condemning state ownership of the real economy. DHD also adheres to the principal of subsidiarity, which says that political decision and governmental administration should be as locally devolved as realistically possible. The party also opposes the virtues of free trade, which it sees as exploitive, and prefers fair trade instead while emphasizing that poor nations should receive aid. As it condemns political violence it also condemn military aggression and opposes the military-industrial complex as well as the construction of WMDs. The party lastly also puts great emphasize on the sustainability of the environment and supports measures to support ecological farming. Even though the majority of party members are also members of the Selucian Patriarchal Church, the DHD does not see itself as a religious party per say. Instead the party wants to enforce the core values of the SDC's Social Teaching while maintaining a strict secular opinion of the seperation of church and state. While not advocating a theocracy, the party members are expected to be Hosians, both in their private life and when sitting in the parliament, even though the party charter decrees no such thing. While being primarily a party of Dranianos ethnicity (almost 95% of members), there is no official nationalist line in the party charter, although some party members have from time to time let slip critical remarks about the increasing ethnically diversification of Dranland. These statements are quick to be condemned form the party top, though, so as to not make the DHD look like hypocrits." |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Civil Rights | restrictive-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Ecology | environmentalist-leaning | high | perfect |
Foreign Relations | isolationist-leaning | high | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | moderate big government | high | perfect |
Market | convinced regulator | excellent | perfect |
Military | pacifist-leaning | high | perfect |
Morality | moderate conservative | excellent | perfect |
Religion | secular-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
November 3070 | 208,722 | 406,924,929 | 0.05 | +0.05 | 0 | 300 | 0.00 | +0 |
November 3076 | 167,119 | 420,645,269 | 0.04 | -0.01 | 0 | 300 | 0.00 | +0 |
June 3401 | 7,902,416 | 64,919,936 | 12.17 | +12.13 | 31 | 250 | 12.40 | +31 |
June 3405 | 6,246,765 | 65,360,563 | 9.56 | -2.62 | 23 | 250 | 9.20 | -8 |
June 3409 | 11,251,807 | 60,909,566 | 18.47 | +8.92 | 47 | 250 | 18.80 | +24 |
November 3412 | 12,627,584 | 65,942,725 | 19.15 | +0.68 | 48 | 250 | 19.20 | +1 |
November 3416 | 9,193,439 | 62,810,622 | 14.64 | -4.51 | 38 | 250 | 15.20 | -10 |
November 3420 | 5,876,805 | 65,220,052 | 9.01 | -5.63 | 23 | 250 | 9.20 | -15 |
July 3458 | 10,328,784 | 53,983,961 | 19.13 | +10.12 | 78 | 400 | 19.50 | +55 |
January 3461 | 11,541,154 | 62,762,102 | 18.39 | -0.74 | 74 | 400 | 18.50 | -4 |
January 3465 | 10,174,822 | 62,141,854 | 16.37 | -2.02 | 66 | 399 | 16.54 | -8 |
January 3469 | 10,734,812 | 57,853,218 | 18.56 | +2.18 | 76 | 399 | 19.05 | +10 |
February 3470 | 11,000,655 | 58,982,941 | 18.65 | +0.10 | 78 | 399 | 19.55 | +2 |
April 3470 | 12,432,442 | 55,593,808 | 22.36 | +3.71 | 94 | 399 | 23.56 | +16 |
April 3472 | 11,595,153 | 62,463,648 | 18.56 | -3.80 | 75 | 399 | 18.80 | -19 |
September 3472 | 12,091,913 | 64,359,881 | 18.79 | +0.22 | 75 | 399 | 18.80 | +0 |
September 3476 | 5,608,656 | 60,672,261 | 9.24 | -9.54 | 38 | 399 | 9.52 | -37 |
October 3477 | 8,405,745 | 62,338,574 | 13.48 | +4.24 | 54 | 399 | 13.53 | +16 |
April 3480 | 11,183,684 | 62,661,405 | 17.85 | +4.36 | 72 | 399 | 18.05 | +18 |
August 3481 | 10,363,886 | 63,607,832 | 16.29 | -1.55 | 65 | 399 | 16.29 | -7 |
September 3484 | 5,600,142 | 62,242,573 | 9.00 | -7.30 | 36 | 399 | 9.02 | -29 |
September 3488 | 5,803,703 | 58,910,014 | 9.85 | +0.85 | 40 | 399 | 10.03 | +4 |
September 3492 | 5,522,118 | 61,696,775 | 8.95 | -0.90 | 35 | 399 | 8.77 | -5 |
February 3494 | 3,214,587 | 63,601,384 | 5.05 | -3.90 | 19 | 399 | 4.76 | -16 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Dranish Hosian Democrats.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Legislative Term Act | January 4414 | January 4414 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of July 4413 | July 4413 | July 4413 | passed | ||
Ratification of the International Terran Bank | April 4413 | July 4413 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, March 4413 | March 4413 | March 4413 | passed | ||
Call for early elections, September 4412 | September 4412 | September 4412 | passed | ||
Monitary Regulation | May 4412 | July 4413 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of January 4412 | January 4412 | January 4412 | defeated | ||
Scientific Research Reform | May 4411 | May 4411 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of April 4411 | April 4411 | May 4411 | defeated | ||
Weapon Sales Regulation | December 4410 | December 4410 | passed | ||
Conscientious Objectors Act | October 4410 | January 4411 | passed | ||
Higer Weapon Sale Rgulation | September 4409 | September 4409 | defeated | ||
Final step for Succession procedure | August 4409 | August 4409 | passed | ||
Sexually Explicit Content Act | July 4409 | August 4409 | passed | ||
Political Education | July 4409 | July 4409 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections to insure Succession, April 4409 | April 4409 | April 4409 | passed | ||
Energy Reform | October 4408 | October 4408 | defeated | ||
Exchange Rate Regulation | August 4408 | August 4408 | defeated | ||
Succession Preparations Act | August 4408 | August 4408 | passed | ||
Income tax proposal of February 4408 | February 4408 | February 4408 | defeated |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "I have opinions of my own - strong opinions. But I don't always agree with them." - George W. Bush |