We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Gwado-Jeongbu (과도정부)[?]
This page contains information about the Gwado-Jeongbu (과도정부).
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: Premier Taylerov (III)
Nation[?]: Kingdom of Great Bae (Dankuk)
Seats[?] in Senate of Great Bae[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
국립 민주당 의 (Guglib-Minjudang) NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS FOUNDED: June 4006 LEADERSHIP: Congressional Speaker: Tong Tokko Kwang Congressional Secretary: Roe Yong Chol HEADQUARTERS: National Democratic Centre Dangmyo (당묘) Reunii (르니) IDEOLOGY: Free-Market Economics Libertarianism Small-Government [Republicanism] YOUTH ORGANIZATION: National Youth Congress - 국립 청소년 의회 (Guglib Cheongsonyeon Uihoe) National Headquarters: National Democratic Centre, Dangmyo (당묘) FORMER LEADERS: 4006 - 4011: Tong Kwang Hoon 4011 - 4019: Kal Chuwon 4019 - 4023: Eoh Dong Hyun 4023 - 4039: Pom Yoo Ri |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Civil Rights | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Ecology | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Market | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Military | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Morality | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Religion | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
May 4011 | 29,664,399 | 35,386,390 | 83.83 | +83.83 | 401 | 480 | 83.54 | +401 |
January 4015 | 21,132,644 | 27,327,353 | 77.33 | -6.50 | 370 | 480 | 77.08 | -31 |
January 4019 | 23,069,679 | 29,215,404 | 78.96 | +1.63 | 378 | 480 | 78.75 | +8 |
January 4023 | 24,756,388 | 51,117,351 | 48.43 | -30.53 | 235 | 480 | 48.96 | -143 |
January 4024 | 26,548,381 | 56,467,659 | 47.02 | -1.42 | 228 | 480 | 47.50 | -7 |
September 4025 | 25,674,595 | 32,054,270 | 80.10 | +33.08 | 382 | 480 | 79.58 | +154 |
September 4029 | 21,564,299 | 28,023,205 | 76.95 | -3.15 | 368 | 480 | 76.67 | -14 |
September 4033 | 27,655,747 | 59,569,294 | 46.43 | -30.53 | 223 | 480 | 46.46 | -145 |
September 4037 | 18,106,296 | 52,047,725 | 34.79 | -11.64 | 170 | 480 | 35.42 | -53 |
February 4038 | 21,797,542 | 28,484,459 | 76.52 | +41.74 | 366 | 480 | 76.25 | +196 |
February 4041 | 16,247,932 | 42,015,640 | 38.67 | -37.85 | 185 | 480 | 38.54 | -181 |
February 4045 | 19,371,027 | 40,319,492 | 48.04 | +9.37 | 231 | 480 | 48.13 | +46 |
February 4049 | 18,379,788 | 39,629,461 | 46.38 | -1.66 | 222 | 480 | 46.25 | -9 |
February 4053 | 17,356,804 | 37,315,563 | 46.51 | +0.13 | 224 | 480 | 46.67 | +2 |
February 4057 | 16,938,846 | 36,350,307 | 46.60 | +0.09 | 224 | 480 | 46.67 | +0 |
February 4061 | 10,406,368 | 39,224,315 | 26.53 | -20.07 | 145 | 480 | 30.21 | -79 |
February 4065 | 11,182,319 | 34,954,070 | 31.99 | +5.46 | 159 | 480 | 33.13 | +14 |
February 4069 | 8,392,357 | 34,149,978 | 24.57 | -7.42 | 129 | 480 | 26.88 | -30 |
February 4073 | 11,926,439 | 29,695,633 | 40.16 | +15.59 | 196 | 480 | 40.83 | +67 |
December 4080 | 12,010,724 | 12,010,724 | 100.00 | +59.84 | 480 | 480 | 100.00 | +284 |
December 4084 | 48,136,961 | 48,172,275 | 99.93 | -0.07 | 480 | 480 | 100.00 | +0 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Gwado-Jeongbu (과도정부).
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Animal Ownership Bill, 3833 | January 3833 | August 3833 | defeated | ||
Death punishment abolition, 3833 | December 3832 | February 3833 | passed | ||
National Service Bill, 3832 | July 3832 | January 3833 | passed | ||
RP Bill: Personal composition and rotation of the 3830-3835 National Council | May 3832 | May 3832 | passed | ||
Marriage Privatization, 3832 | April 3832 | November 3832 | defeated | ||
Traditional Marriage Bill, 3832 | February 3832 | December 3832 | passed | ||
Refugees Bill | December 3831 | May 3832 | defeated | ||
Non-Religious Education Bill | December 3831 | May 3832 | defeated | ||
Income tax proposal of December 3831 | December 3831 | January 3832 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of December 3831 | December 3831 | January 3832 | passed | ||
Defence Supplies Bill, 3831 | August 3831 | February 3832 | passed | ||
Energy Privatisation Bill, 3831 | June 3831 | February 3832 | passed | ||
OOC: Constitutional variables | May 3831 | May 3835 | passed | ||
Organic Dranland, 3831 | April 3831 | November 3831 | defeated | ||
The Right of Self-defence, 3831 | April 3831 | November 3831 | defeated | ||
Animal liberation, 3831 | April 3831 | November 3831 | defeated | ||
Dankuk National Railways, 3831 | April 3831 | August 3831 | defeated | ||
Pensions, 3831 | April 3831 | August 3831 | defeated | ||
Pollution Standards Bill | November 3830 | May 3831 | defeated | ||
Nuclear Power Ban Bill | November 3830 | May 3831 | defeated |
Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy". |
Random quote: "Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom." - Friedrich Hayek |