We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Classical Liberal Party[?]
This page contains information about the Classical Liberal Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: John Kirkland
Nation[?]: Empire Canrillais - Confédération rildanorienne (Rildanor)
Seats[?] in Conseil national (National Council)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
The Classical Liberal Party is for people who do not agree with all of the mainstream Libertarian thought. We disagree with ancro-capitalism and favor minarchism. We are against big government and feel that the more power you give to the government for it to accomplish good things the more power you've given the government to do bad things. Party Platforms: laissez faire economic policy property rights protected by the government small government that provides basic services and protects citizens rights secular party pro abortion anti death penalty pro gun rights anti eminent domain anti welfare/entitlement programs |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | moderate unitarist | moderate | perfect |
Civil Rights | moderate permissive | moderate | perfect |
Ecology | extreme skeptic | limited | perfect |
Foreign Relations | moderate internationalist | limited | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | extreme small government | limited | perfect |
Market | moderate laissez-faire | limited | perfect |
Military | moderate militarist | close to none | perfect |
Morality | moderate progressive | high | perfect |
Religion | convinced secular | moderate | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
May 2205 | 4,320,745 | 34,383,375 | 12.57 | +12.57 | 71 | 600 | 11.83 | +71 |
November 2207 | 5,677,952 | 32,144,661 | 17.66 | +5.10 | 94 | 600 | 15.67 | +23 |
May 2210 | 5,506,394 | 33,081,968 | 16.64 | -1.02 | 91 | 600 | 15.17 | -3 |
November 2212 | 6,050,322 | 36,513,715 | 16.57 | -0.07 | 93 | 600 | 15.50 | +2 |
May 2215 | 7,278,992 | 37,997,930 | 19.16 | +2.59 | 104 | 600 | 17.33 | +11 |
November 2217 | 5,485,804 | 40,060,569 | 13.69 | -5.46 | 102 | 750 | 13.60 | -2 |
May 2220 | 8,494,393 | 39,157,992 | 21.69 | +8.00 | 161 | 750 | 21.47 | +59 |
May 2223 | 6,370,409 | 40,569,106 | 15.70 | -5.99 | 118 | 750 | 15.73 | -43 |
May 2226 | 7,566,602 | 42,563,584 | 17.78 | +2.07 | 133 | 750 | 17.73 | +15 |
May 2229 | 6,992,892 | 43,633,174 | 16.03 | -1.75 | 96 | 600 | 16.00 | -37 |
May 2232 | 7,103,323 | 38,592,449 | 18.41 | +2.38 | 112 | 600 | 18.67 | +16 |
May 2235 | 10,616,595 | 42,417,687 | 25.03 | +6.62 | 149 | 600 | 24.83 | +37 |
May 2238 | 11,314,936 | 43,698,030 | 25.89 | +0.86 | 153 | 600 | 25.50 | +4 |
May 2241 | 9,709,085 | 44,765,813 | 21.69 | -4.20 | 128 | 600 | 21.33 | -25 |
May 2244 | 8,211,541 | 46,146,420 | 17.79 | -3.89 | 108 | 600 | 18.00 | -20 |
May 2247 | 16,972,166 | 43,753,612 | 38.79 | +21.00 | 230 | 600 | 38.33 | +122 |
May 2250 | 14,128,308 | 45,125,806 | 31.31 | -7.48 | 186 | 600 | 31.00 | -44 |
May 2253 | 13,180,694 | 44,028,863 | 29.94 | -1.37 | 179 | 600 | 29.83 | -7 |
January 2254 | 18,107,112 | 45,134,658 | 40.12 | +10.18 | 237 | 600 | 39.50 | +58 |
January 2257 | 17,473,189 | 43,963,269 | 39.74 | -0.37 | 235 | 600 | 39.17 | -2 |
January 2260 | 18,001,675 | 43,519,253 | 41.36 | +1.62 | 245 | 600 | 40.83 | +10 |
January 2263 | 3,433,750 | 29,041,694 | 11.82 | -29.54 | 69 | 600 | 11.50 | -176 |
January 2266 | 11,870,132 | 36,868,200 | 32.20 | +20.37 | 184 | 600 | 30.67 | +115 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Classical Liberal Party.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Nationalization Omnibus Act, 3345 | February 3345 | February 3345 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of February 3345 | February 3345 | February 3345 | passed | ||
Taxation Act, 3345 | February 3345 | February 3345 | passed | ||
Income tax proposal of February 3345 | February 3345 | February 3345 | passed | ||
27e Sénat | January 3344 | January 3344 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of July 3343 | July 3343 | July 3343 | passed | ||
Recognition of Succession Act, 3341 | April 3341 | April 3341 | passed | ||
26e Sénat | November 3340 | November 3340 | passed | ||
Beaulin II | November 3340 | November 3340 | passed | ||
Call for early elections, October 3340 | October 3340 | October 3340 | passed | ||
Canrille Capital City Act, 3341 | June 3339 | May 3342 | passed | ||
25e Sénat | July 3338 | January 3340 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of July 3338 - Raševič III | July 3338 | July 3338 | passed | ||
Income tax proposal of April 3338 | April 3338 | April 3338 | passed | ||
Labour Union Act, 3337 | August 3337 | August 3337 | passed | ||
Corporate Tax Act, 3337 | August 3337 | August 3337 | passed | ||
Steps to Progress - Part IV, August 3337 | August 3337 | August 3337 | passed | ||
LST Act, 3337 | August 3337 | August 3337 | passed | ||
Tertiary Education Charter Act, 3337 | June 3337 | August 3337 | passed | ||
Baccalauréat Act, 3336 | August 3336 | February 3337 | passed |
Random fact: You can view helpful ideological statistics about the regions in your nation on the region pages. You can also view detailed political opinions and the importance of them there as well. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |