Social Liberal Peoples Party[?]
This page contains information about the Social Liberal Peoples Party.
This party is inactive.
|The Social Liberal Peoples Party promotes an open society, human rights, freedom, moderate market regulation, multiculturalism and international cooperation.|
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
|Foreign Relations||moderate internationalist||moderate||perfect|
|Government Responsibilities||small government-leaning||moderate||perfect|
This party is a member of the following organizations:
|Month||Votes||Total Votes||Votes (%)||Votes (%) (+)||Seats||Total Seats||Seats (%)||Seats (+)|
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
This party has to vote on the following bills:
This is the voting[?] record of the Social Liberal Peoples Party.
|Bill||Created||Voting started||Vote||Bill Status||Result|
|Ecology||March 2155||March 2155||passed|
|LBSC Initiative 45 - No Restrictions on the Market||February 2155||February 2155||defeated|
|LBSC Initiative 44 - Protected Police||February 2155||February 2155||defeated|
|LBSC Initiative 43 - Gated Communities||February 2155||February 2155||defeated|
|LBSC Initiative 42 - Extradition||February 2155||February 2155||defeated|
|LBSC Initiative 41 - The Death Penalty||February 2155||February 2155||defeated|
|LBSC Initiative 40 - Kick out the Government||February 2155||February 2155||passed|
|LBSC Initiative 39 - Unregulate Energy||February 2155||February 2155||defeated|
|LBSC Initiative 38 - Private Sports Clubs||February 2155||February 2155||passed|
|LBSC Initiative 37 - The Draft||February 2155||February 2155||defeated|
|LBSC Initiative 36 - DEFENSE! DEFENSE!||February 2155||February 2155||passed|
|LBSC Initiative 35 - 24 Month Terms||February 2155||February 2155||defeated|
|LBSC Initiative 34 - Citizenship||February 2155||February 2155||defeated|
|Economic Compromise and Stability Act of 2153 Part II: Expenses||February 2155||February 2155||defeated|
|Economic Compromise and Stability Act of 2153 Part III: Revenue||February 2155||February 2155||defeated|
|550 again||September 2154||September 2154||defeated|
|National Health||June 2154||June 2154||passed|
|Darnussian Defense||June 2154||June 2154||passed|
|Child Rights Act||February 2154||February 2154||defeated|
|Religious Freedom Bill||February 2154||February 2154||defeated|
|Random fact: The default rule is that role-play events can only be done with the consent of all of the players in the nation or nations concerned, and that if one of the players withdraws consent for the role-play, then the role-play becomes void. However, there are procedures available to overcome the risk of a role-play being brought down like this. These procedures cannot compel players to actively participate in a role-play, but they do oblige them not to stand in the way of them and to recognise their legitimacy under the rules.|
|Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)|