We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 3674
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3675
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the President of the Commonwealth chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Federalist Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Federalist Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Federalist Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Federalist Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:56:00, June 02, 2014 CET | From |  Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3674 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The PPFD has won a plurality of seats, being less than 5% short of a solid majority. They are currently the most popular party in Lodamun, and deserve to be in the government. We understand and agree with that. However, we cannot support a cabinet with the Federalist Party. They are the least popular party in Lodamun. They only have seats in 2 states. They won no seats in the 3 states with the highest population. We should really take a close look at the election results: http://classic.particracy.net/viewnews.php?newsid=423253 The Federalists want to control Trade & Industry, while not knowing anything about Lodamun's economy. - The first example, Mr. Speaker, is their false claim that all of Lodamun's industry is owned and operated by the state: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=409645 - The second example, Mr. Speaker, is that they have proposed to cut taxes on luxury goods without informing the Presidium of the change in revenue and whether it will be necessary to cut spending: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=409765 -- Rolf Orman II, Chairman of the GNRG, (Incumbent) President of Lodamun |
| Date | 17:46:47, June 02, 2014 CET | From | People's Party for Freedom and Democracy | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3674 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We are in favor of a winner's cabinet. We are also confident that the Federalists will do a bit of studying so that they better understand our economy, in order to reform it drastically. Aaron Aldermann, Chairman of the PPFD |
| Date | 18:10:39, June 02, 2014 CET | From | Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3674 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, They didn't do it the first time. What will make them do it this time? Before the last election for the Presidium, they made the claim that all industry in Lodamun is owned and operated by the state. This claim is false, and they have not withdrawn it. After the last election, they proposed a ridiculous bill to ban DWCs and cut our revenue by 34%. They haven't proposed a budget cut to go along with the cut in revenue. They probably don't care. They are not competent to handle the Ministry of Finance. Additionally, they only have seats in 2 states, and those states had the smallest population in the last election. -- Rolf Orman II, Chairman of the GNRG, (Incumbent) President of Lodamun |
| Date | 02:38:40, June 03, 2014 CET | From | Federalist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3674 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, As the FP and the PPFD have the most similar outlook when it comes to policy, it is only natural that we would desire to work together. I'd like to remind the body that a coalition government of PPFD and the FP constitutes a majority. |
| Date | 03:44:39, June 03, 2014 CET | From | Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3674 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We know that the FP and PPFD together have a majority. The coalition is legitimate. what we fear is the FP's incompetence. It will destroy Lodamun. -- Rolf Orman II, Chairman of the GNRG, (Incumbent) President of Lodamun |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 321 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 133 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 145 |
| Random fact: Players who deliberately attempt to present a misleading picture of the nation's current RP laws will be subject to sanction. |
| Random quote: "Hunger makes a thief of any man." - Pearl S. Buck |