We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Heritage Party of Hutori
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4073
Description[?]:
| G. McCreight v. The Rocc-Cola Corporation Supreme Court Appeal Original Trial: (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=474450) Appeal: (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=475151) Petitioner: Gwen McCreight, Cheyne McCreight Legal Counsel: Chloe Mitchell The plaintiff alleges that the Rocc-Cola Corporation was in breach of contract when they liquidated her shares of the company. Respondent: The Rocc-Cola Corporation, Clinton L. Wayne Legal Counsel: Adam McLaughlin, Nathan Callahan The defense contends that Ms. McCreight willingly withdrew from the corporation allowing them to liquidate her share in the company consistent with Hutorian law. Evidence: Exhibit A: Rocc-Cola International Terran Bank Statement Exhibit B: Correspondence between Mr. Wayne and Ms. McCreight Exhibit C: Additional correspondence between Mr. Wayne and Ms. McCreight OOC: Gwen McCreight: toro42 Justice John Tyler: MadMaz Justice Wyatt Damon: RIS Justice Sam Core: MackinAintEasy Chief Justice Mortimer Grey: Apulia-3 Justice Lance Patten: Vesica5 Clinton Wayne: MackinAintEasy Adam McLaughlin: RIS Nathan Callahan: Vesica5 Anna Steuart: Vesica5 Chloe Mitchell: toro42 Cheyne McCreight: toro42 Kathy Bishop: RIS |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:28:59, June 28, 2016 CET | From | National Monarchist Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | "Ladies and gentlemen of the court, The petitioner may now present his argument." - Chief Justice Mortimer Grey |
| Date | 20:03:18, June 28, 2016 CET | From |  La Gauche/Les Verts (LV) | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF HUTORI Case No. APC05-382 CLINTON WAYNE and ROCC-COLA CORPORATION vs. GWEN MCCREIGHT. ______________________________________________________________ ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE HUTORIAN SUPREME COURT CASE NOS. 3A113-5306, 3A11-5495 and 3A12-644 PREFACE In this Brief, the Respondent CLINTON WAYNE will be referred to as WAYNE. The Petitioner ROCC-COLA CORPORATION will be referred to as ROCC-COLA. The Petitioner GWEN MCCREIGHT will be referred to as MCCREIGHT. ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW The previous court ruling does not accurately take into account Hutorian Industry & Trade Regulation Article 32 Subsection A, MCCREIGHT willing withdrawal from ROCC-COLA or the lack of communication from MCCREIGHT to WAYNE. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS This appeal arises from the post-judgement ruling by the trial court on the issue of whether or not WAYNE was in compliance or in breach of Hutorian contractual law. The underlying litigation arose from WAYNE and ROCC-COLA liquidating the shares formerly owned by MCCREIGHT. The defense argued that Hutorian Industry & Trade Regulation Article 32 Subsection A which states: “After the willful withdrawal from a company, corporation or financial endeavor it is the duty of the entity withdrawing to either liquidate their equity in said endeavor or to provide concrete intentions for said equity. If the entity withdrawing fails to do so within a period of two years then the corporation, company or individual remaining in the endeavor can seize the remaining equity to ensure for the continued successful operation of the endeavor.” Allowed for the seizure and liquidation of MCCREIGHT’s shares. The Defense argued that concrete intentions were not provided in Exhibit B which was delivered before the two years required had passed, that confirmation of intention was never sent and that an inquiry into the status of the account (Exhibit C)was not sent until four years after the willing withdrawal. While MCCREIGHT acknowledges that the communication was sent at the specified times, the petitioner alleges that confirmation was assumed and that the shares should have been kept under her name. |
| Date | 20:08:42, June 30, 2016 CET | From |  Liberal Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | Would the Defence like to present their argument? Asscioate Justice Lance Patten |
| Date | 21:57:47, June 30, 2016 CET | From | La Gauche/Les Verts (LV) | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | OOC: This was the appellate brief, not my opening statement. |
| Date | 22:07:03, June 30, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | OOC: then by all means open your statement lol... this is languishing |
| Date | 22:47:22, June 30, 2016 CET | From | La Gauche/Les Verts (LV) | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | OOC: Sorry, statement coming up. Apulia just asked for my appellate brief. |
| Date | 02:48:15, July 03, 2016 CET | From | La Gauche/Les Verts (LV) | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | OOC: So sorry for the delay. Been busy lately. |
| Date | 04:52:38, July 09, 2016 CET | From | La Gauche/Les Verts (LV) | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | Your honor, Upon entry to the Rocc Cola Group, the McCreight family purchased a 4% share in the Group. That amount was soon increased to 20%, on which they spent tens of billions of LOD. Multiple decades later, the McCreights left the Rocc Cola Group and immediately requested to keep their shares. Monsieur Wayne replied that that was possible. The next time they checked the share ownership, their share was gone. The plaintiffs hereby make their case that the Rocc Cola Group unlawfully (by company law) confiscated their share. Chief Justice Chloe Mitchell Legal Counsel the the McCreights |
| Date | 17:25:22, July 11, 2016 CET | From | National Monarchist Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | "Thank you Ms. Mitchell. The defense may now present their argument." |
| Date | 20:31:39, July 13, 2016 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF HUTORI Case No. APC05-382 CLINTON WAYNE and ROCC-COLA CORPORATION Respondents, vs. GWEN MCCREIGHT, Petitioner. ______________________________________________________________ ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE HUTORIAN SUPREME COURT CASE NOS. 3A113-5306, 3A11-5495 and 3A12-644 PREFACE In this Brief, the Respondent CLINTON WAYNE will be referred to as WAYNE. The Respondent ROCC-COLA CORPORATION will be referred to as ROCC-COLA. The Petitioner GWEN MCCREIGHT will be referred to as MCCREIGHT. ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW The previous court ruling does not accurately take into account Hutorian Industry & Trade Regulation Article 32 Subsection A, MCCREIGHT willing withdrawal from ROCC-COLA or the lack of communication from MCCREIGHT to WAYNE. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS This appeal arises from the post-judgement ruling by the trial court on the issue of whether or not WAYNE was in compliance or in breach of Hutorian contractual law. The underlying litigation arose from WAYNE and ROCC-COLA liquidating the shares formerly owned by MCCREIGHT. The defense argued that Hutorian Industry & Trade Regulation Article 32 Subsection A which states: “After the willful withdrawal from a company, corporation or financial endeavor it is the duty of the entity withdrawing to either liquidate their equity in said endeavor or to provide concrete intentions for said equity. If the entity withdrawing fails to do so within a period of two years then the corporation, company or individual remaining in the endeavor can seize the remaining equity to ensure for the continued successful operation of the endeavor.” Allowed for the seizure and liquidation of MCCREIGHT’s shares. The Defense argued that concrete intentions were not provided in Exhibit B which was delivered before the two years required had passed, that confirmation of intention was never sent and that an inquiry into the status of the account (Exhibit C)was not sent until four years after the willing withdrawal. |
| Date | 20:35:47, July 13, 2016 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | Your Honors, We contend that everything that my client did with respect to McCreight's shares was well within the bounds of Hutorian Law. Specifically as outlined by Hutorian Industry and Trade Regulation Article 32 Subsection A as outlined in the accompanying brief. Therefore Ms. McCreight has no grounds for the her petition. Adam McLaughlin Rocc-Cola Legal Counsel |
| Date | 00:27:25, July 24, 2016 CET | From | La Gauche/Les Verts (LV) | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | Is this trial still being debated by the justices? |
| Date | 23:05:38, July 27, 2016 CET | From | National Monarchist Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | The Justices shall now return to our chambers for deliberations and then present our decision. - Chief Justice Mortimer Grey OOC: justices message me your opinions |
| Date | 18:43:12, July 29, 2016 CET | From | La Gauche/Les Verts (LV) | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | OOC: Please do not consider this trial useless because of my inactivity. In fact, I'm returning August 6 as the Coalition of Progressive Aldurians. |
| Date | 00:43:43, August 02, 2016 CET | From | National Monarchist Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | OOC: RIS and MadMaz still need to PM me |
| Date | 21:05:11, August 07, 2016 CET | From | Coalition of Progressive Aldurians (CPA) | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | OOC: Told ya I'd be back! What are we going to do about the fact the MackinAintEasy and MadMaz are gone? |
| Date | 03:12:53, August 09, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | OOC: I'm still around and anxiously awaiting the verdict. |
| Date | 21:16:26, August 09, 2016 CET | From | National Monarchist Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | Ladies and gentlemen of the court, In a 3-1 decision, the appeals court decision has been upheld. - Chief Justice Mortimer Grey |
| Date | 21:44:50, August 09, 2016 CET | From | Coalition of Progressive Aldurians (CPA) | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | We would like to reenter this case (start from the lower courts and have it come back up). |
| Date | 00:07:57, August 11, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | With respect you'll have the exact same response. Ours is the final say on the matter and whether or not you come back through the court system it'll arrive back at the Supreme Court and in all likelihood we'll uphold this matter again. The case is closed. Justice Lance Patten |
| Date | 00:15:57, August 11, 2016 CET | From | Coalition of Progressive Aldurians (CPA) | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian Supreme Court: G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | OOC: I meant starting over from the lowest court. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 600 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English. |
| Random quote: "Changing the way we measure things is vital. So is decompartmentalising society making sure that economics and politics are not divorced from other crucial areas of life." - David Attenborough |