We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Take Beluzia Back Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Beluz People's Party (BPP)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4133
Description[?]:
| We need to stop listening to international agencies and start listening to the people again. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the United Nations of Terra.
Article 2
Withdraw from the International Free Trade Agreement.
Article 3
Withdraw from the Treaty of the Collective Security and Cooperation Organization.
Article 4
Withdraw from the International Confederation for Applied Chemistry and Biological Research (ICACBR).
Article 5
Withdraw from the Republican International Pact.
Article 6
Withdraw from the Worldwide Treaty of Friendship with Aloria.
Article 7
Withdraw from the Rocc-Cola Group Franchising Treaty.
Article 8
Withdraw from the Sperry & Hutchinson (S&H) Green Stamps Program.
Article 9
Withdraw from the The Fair Election Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:07:52, December 10, 2016 CET | From | Freedom Socialist Party | To | Debating the Take Beluzia Back Bill |
| Message | Friends of the BPP! Can we be honest? The description you guys gave for the proposal threw us off immediately... Some of this Treaties need reexamination as fast as possible, we wholeheartdly agree with you guys on that. The Fair Election Treaty, for instance, is being studied by our men and women daily for an long time, and it have some points that need parliamentary clarification immediately, requesting our withdrawal if said clarification is not fully satisfactory. As a matter of fact, the Fair Election Treaty were propposed by an party of our Beluzia. To the surprise of no one in our headquarters, it was made by an Conservative Coalition. Maybe Labour could give us some insight about them, but the name says a lot. The problem is that withdrawing from absolutely all international treaties doesn't seem like something that makes sense for us. We are not bending ourselves to any international organisation, friends. We insist that every Treaty should be read by all parties in an detailed manner. We are not accusing anyone of not doing that, please. We are just arguing that this treaties are not all the same. And more important: they are not impositions by other countries on us. Every single one of them was ratified in our National Assembly. Does that mean we should never touch them? Of course not, as the beggining of our speech made it clear. But we need an careful and detailed approach to this matter, discussing every Treaty and showing the problems said Treaty has, and why are we willing to change it. If you guys are up to do it, we will comment on every matter, giving you some of our humble insights. Dr. Cris Rocha Professor of International Law Speaker of Defense matters for the People's Coutinho Party |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 209 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 391 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If your "Bills under debate" section is cluttered up with old bills created by inactive parties, report them for deletion on the Bill Clearouts Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "We cannot acknowledge allegiance to any human government... Our country is the world, our countrymen are all mankind." - William Lloyd Garrison |