We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: F-63: Executive Definition Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Heritage Party of Hutori
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4234
Description[?]:
| This bill seeks to formally define the powers endowed to the executive and it's members. Section 1) The President Article 1) The President has the right to appoint Justices to the Supreme Court when one of the existing Justices is found either incompetent or has deceased. This appointment must be approved by a majority of the Senate. Article 2) The President is to act as the Commander in Chief of the Hutorian Military. Article 4) The cabinet is to serve as the President's advisers in matters of state. Article 6) The President's duty is to uphold the law to the best of his or her ability, to defend the nation and it's people and to conduct international relations. Article 7) The aforementioned duties can be delegated to the appropriate members of the cabinet. Section 2) The Prime Minister Article 1) The Prime Minister serves as the chair of the cabinet, at the behest of the President and is the next in the line of succession. Article 2) The members of the cabinet answer to the Prime Minister and must carry out his or her orders unless they directly contradict those of the President. Article 3) The Prime Minister has the right to call a vote of no confidence in the President. If done each member of the cabinet must vote either in favor of the President or against him or her. Article 4) In the event that a vote of no confidence is passed the Prime Minister will serve as the interim President until elections can be called. It is therefore the duty of said Prime Minister to call for elections as soon as possible. Section 3) The Cabinet and Line of Succession Article 1) The cabinet members may be required to submit reports on their Ministry's progress at the Prime Minister's or President's leisure. Article 2) The aforementioned reports can include but, are not limited to Intelligence, Financial and Action Reports. Article 3) The Prime Minister may dismiss a member of the cabinet with sufficient cause and Presidential approval. However, likewise the President must receive approval from the Prime Minister before dismissing a cabinet member. Article 4) The cabinet serves at the Prime Minister's and President's behest and as such is required to accomplish the goals of the administration to the best of their ability. Article 5) The line of succession is as follows: the Prime Minister, the Foreign Affairs Minster, the Internal Affairs Minster, the Defense Minister, the Minister of Justice, the Finance Minister, the Speaker of the Senate, the Minister of Trade and Industry, the Minister of Science and Technology, the Minister of Education and Culture, the Minister of Food and Agriculture, the Minister of Health and Social Services, the Minister of Infrastructure and Transport and then the Minister of Environment and Tourism. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:25:20, June 18, 2017 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the F-63: Executive Definition Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I hereby open this proposal to debate. Senator Wyatt McLaughlin (F-AD) Federalist Senate Leader OOC: We don't necessarily have to change the name of the Prime Minister and if there are any objections other than that please let me know. I'm really just looking to provide concrete RP definitions to current roles. |
| Date | 04:49:54, June 19, 2017 CET | From | National Progress Party | To | Debating the F-63: Executive Definition Act |
| Message | ''Mr. Speaker We disagree to the idea of having the Speaker of the Senate second in the line of succession, for us, speaker does not seem like a enough important position to deserve to be so high in the line of succession'' -Daphne Chang Senator and former Prime Minister OOC: There many place in your text where the word ''Chancellor'' is used. Shouldn't you replace it by ''Prime Minister''? |
| Date | 06:05:45, June 19, 2017 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the F-63: Executive Definition Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We would like to ask of the Senator Chang where she and her party would place the Speaker in the line of succession? Senator Wyatt McLaughlin (F-AD) Federalist Senate Leader OOC: I largely based the line of succession on the U.S.' that's why the speaker is second. Furthermore I'll change the Chancellor to Prime Minister if you don't like it but, I was trying to make us have a bit more of a unique political structure. |
| Date | 03:17:44, June 21, 2017 CET | From | National Progress Party | To | Debating the F-63: Executive Definition Act |
| Message | ''Mr. Speaker Here the line of succession that we would propose: the Prime Minister, the Foreign Affairs Minster, the Defense Minister, the Internal Affairs Minster, the Minister of Justice, the Finance Minister, the Minister of Trade and Industry, the Minister of Science and Technology, the Minister of Education and Culture, the Minister of Food and Agriculture, the Minister of Health and Social Services, the Minister of Infrastructure and Transport, the Minister of Environment and Tourism and then the Speaker of the Senate'' --Daphne Chang Senator and former Prime Minister OOC: Hutori is very different from the U.S so I don't think you should base the line fo succession on them. In the U.S, the speaker is a very important position while in Hutori the speaker is just the person who arbitrate the debate so I don't think he shoudlbe put at the begining of the line of sucession. I would prefer the title of ''chancellor'' to be change to ''Prime Minister'' as I think chancellor is not a titles that suit the actual political culture of Hutori. |
| Date | 03:33:37, June 29, 2017 CET | From | Social Liberal Party | To | Debating the F-63: Executive Definition Act |
| Message | OCC: I think that we should create the office of Leader of the Official Opposition, which is the leader of the largest Senate party that is not in government, like in every Westminster political system |
| Date | 04:06:36, June 29, 2017 CET | From | National Progress Party | To | Debating the F-63: Executive Definition Act |
| Message | OOC: Technically, we already do. We just don't really use the title of ''leader of the opposition'' anymore but it still exist. |
| Date | 12:10:52, June 29, 2017 CET | From |  Liberal Party of Hutori | To | Debating the F-63: Executive Definition Act |
| Message | OOC: more specifically no one choses to use the term Leader of the Official Opposition. It very much exists; I actively use it when I'm the largest opposition party both federally and when I RP Provincal parties. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 495 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 105 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated. |
| Random quote: "Civil disobedience. . . is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that numbers of people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience. . Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war, and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem." - Howard Zinn |