We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Dosmund Climate Accords
Details
Submitted by[?]: Unity Labour Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4402
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Dosmund Climate Accords. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Dosmund Climate Accords.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:04:37, May 31, 2018 CET | From | Unity Labour Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dosmund Climate Accords |
| Message | As Foreign minister I put this bill for debate. Mr Speaker I must say that we as a State has experienced the effects of man-made climate change that it's best we do our part is seeking to limit our contributions to man-made climate change in using less fossil fuels for energy needs and use better and sustainable approach. Also, Mr Speaker, this agreement ensures that we pursue sustainable energy which can also result in cheaper energy prices to consumer and limits our vulnerability on supply of energy from abroad. |
| Date | 03:05:10, May 31, 2018 CET | From | Unity Labour Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dosmund Climate Accords |
| Message | As Foreign minister I put this bill for debate. Mr Speaker I must say that we as a State has experienced the effects of man-made climate change that it's best we do our part is seeking to limit our contributions to man-made climate change in using less fossil fuels for energy needs and use better and sustainable approach. Also, Mr Speaker, this agreement ensures that we pursue sustainable energy which can also result in cheaper energy prices to consumer and limits our vulnerability on supply of energy from abroad. I Urge My fellow members to support this overwhelmingly |
| Date | 10:11:55, May 31, 2018 CET | From | Wind of Change | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dosmund Climate Accords |
| Message | Nuclear power is not the solution to climate change, we can use it while we are researching and improving renewable and clean energies but it's dangerous, we would need to extract uranium, we should create a nuclear cemetery and it is not a renewable energy. We won't support a treaty that force us to use this kind of energy whose use we should reduce not increase. |
| Date | 15:40:22, May 31, 2018 CET | From | United We Can | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dosmund Climate Accords |
| Message | We support article 2, but we will never bow to the multinationals and big companies of nuclear energy. We can not allow this aberration to come forward. In addition, the best way to fight against climate change is to encourage self-consumption and greatly increase current regulations regarding pollution. We can only say something: Go Augustine, go away. |
| Date | 15:45:48, May 31, 2018 CET | From | United We Can | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dosmund Climate Accords |
| Message | It is shameful that his party, the sixth political force of Malivia that is considered "moderate" and "center-left" (which is not the case), governs with the leftists of Wind of Change (who, by the way, have betrayed not including them in the cabinet), the Stalinists, militarists and authoritarians of the Front of the Nation and the Party of the "Plurality" of Malivia, (Rightists, capitalists and conservatives). Go away please. |
| Date | 15:50:24, May 31, 2018 CET | From | United for Peace | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dosmund Climate Accords |
| Message | We find it reasonable |
| Date | 16:30:04, May 31, 2018 CET | From | Hosian National Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dosmund Climate Accords |
| Message | Thorium is a pretty good candidate for nuclear energy, instead of uranium. It's more abundant, it doesn't need to be enriched, it can be controlled and it produces less dangerous waste. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 274 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 158 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 68 |
| Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy". |
| Random quote: "The first step in freeing yourself from social restrictions is the realization that there is no such thing as a 'safe' code of conduct, one that would earn everyone's approval. Your actions can always be condemned by someone, for being too bold or too apathetic, for being too conformist or too nonconformist, for being too liberal or too conservative. So it's necessary to decide whose approval is important to you." - Harry Browne |