Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5475
Next month in: 02:32:09
Server time: 09:27:50, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: OOC: National Security Role-Play Authorization

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party (Hardliners)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 5330

Description[?]:

I've planned a Role-Play about setting up an extensive Imperial Security Service counterintelligence mission, seeking to arrest and interrogate as many spies found in Luthori as possible. In this fact, I ask that the players in Luthori, who will be in this RP, thanks to the CONSEPS, which manages (de jure) the Imperial Security Service, can collaborate in the establishment of RP. Any questions could be posted in the debate section.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:09:40, July 10, 2023 CET
From Labour Party
ToDebating the OOC: National Security Role-Play Authorization
MessageOOC: This obsession with creating RPs about the "spies" and similar stuff is utterly tiresome. I do not want loads of RP to deal with again like the assassination of Charles XI and I want to relax a bit because I need to handle 5331 elections and the coalition negotiations afterwards the elections.

Date23:10:35, July 10, 2023 CET
FromUnion of the Lion (Reform) 🦁
ToDebating the OOC: National Security Role-Play Authorization
MessageOOC: What does this piece of role-play have to do with the assassination of the Emperor? While I would agree with you that was poorly handled in an out-of-character sense, this is completely unrelated to that.

Date23:14:23, July 10, 2023 CET
From Labour Party
ToDebating the OOC: National Security Role-Play Authorization
MessageOOC: This is not about relation, this is about loads of RP that is likely to occur after it.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
        

Total Seats: 588

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map.

    Random quote: "Thousands of Zardic soldiers were sacrificed so that the Zardic government could gain control of a few buildings and Theodoro could pretend to be Augustus the Great. This is the kind of jingoistic ideology Zardugal would bring to the Security Council. They will throw countless lives away in pursuit of former glory." - Prince Akhaias, former Coburan royal

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 44