We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Democratic Party for Progression[?]
This page contains information about the Democratic Party for Progression.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Gran Prinċipat ta’ Kildanja (Cildania)
Seats[?] in Kunsill tad-Deputati (Council of Deputies)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
The Democratic Party for Progression promotes a free market to increase welfare for all the citizens the Cildanian Republic. |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | close to none | perfect |
Civil Rights | moderate permissive | moderate | perfect |
Ecology | moderate environmentalist | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | extreme internationalist | limited | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | convinced small government | limited | perfect |
Market | moderate laissez-faire | moderate | perfect |
Military | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Morality | moderate progressive | limited | perfect |
Religion | moderate secular | limited | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
May 2444 | 16,102,755 | 79,292,112 | 20.31 | +20.31 | 87 | 425 | 20.47 | +87 |
October 2447 | 18,229,619 | 78,631,923 | 23.18 | +2.88 | 101 | 425 | 23.76 | +14 |
October 2450 | 11,927,006 | 79,255,721 | 15.05 | -8.13 | 67 | 425 | 15.76 | -34 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Democratic Party for Progression.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Call for early elections, September 2452 | September 2452 | September 2452 | passed | ||
In Support of Self Defense | May 2452 | October 2452 | defeated | ||
Promoting Pride in Citizenship | May 2452 | October 2452 | passed | ||
Respecting Individual Spirituality | May 2452 | October 2452 | passed | ||
the "Good Neighbor" Bill | February 2452 | February 2452 | defeated | ||
In Support of Sensible Government | February 2452 | February 2452 | defeated | ||
In Support of Economic Fairness | January 2452 | January 2452 | passed | ||
In Support of the Freedom to Work | January 2452 | January 2452 | passed | ||
In Support of Human Advancement | January 2452 | January 2452 | passed | ||
In Support of Human Life | January 2452 | January 2452 | passed | ||
Religious Reform Act | November 2451 | January 2452 | defeated | ||
Education Improvement Act | November 2451 | January 2452 | passed | ||
Reforming economics | November 2451 | November 2451 | defeated | ||
New Reforms | November 2451 | November 2451 | defeated | ||
Free Trade Defence Act | November 2451 | November 2451 | defeated | ||
Emergency Defence Bill | October 2451 | October 2451 | passed | ||
Prison Funding Reform | October 2451 | October 2451 | defeated | ||
In Order to Form a More Perfect Business Climate | October 2451 | October 2451 | defeated | ||
Economically Efficient Ecological Reform | September 2451 | September 2451 | defeated | ||
In the Interest of Advancing Scientific Progress | July 2451 | July 2451 | defeated |
Random fact: "Jezvraljogadsrlji" means "Social" in the Jelbic languages. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |