We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Partido Democratico Social[?]
This page contains information about the Partido Democratico Social.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: República Gaduridana (Gaduridos)
Seats[?] in Congreso Nacional de la República de Gaduridos (National Congress of the Republic of Gaduridos)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
A center left party with a willingness to grant large amounts of civil rights to the citizens. The party's power has waned in recent years, but it's been the party with the most votes on all but one occasion. That occasion being the election of 2800. It's also been the largest party on all but two occasions, those being between 2800 and 2802 and between 2804 and 2806. The party was formed in 2799 as the Partido Democratico Social, and made an ill-advised attempt to unseat the Partidos de Los Agricultores in 2800. The failure to do so, only worked to strengthen its supporters, and the subsequent collapse of the Partidos de Los Agricultores launched the (renamed) Social Democratic Party to power and fame. However, it also gave its well known and (as every Gaduridan knows) much disliked rival, the Libertario Aliatu, which was formed shortly after the ruling party's collapse, a large chunk of seats as well, and in the next election they gained a slim (two seat) majority. The then named SDP regained power shortly thereafter, and pursued an aggressive agenda, which they only stopped after they lost the absolute majority in 2813 (more for lack of new proposal ideas than anything). They continue to work to make Gaduridos a better place for all inhabitants, as well as a respected entity worldwide The Party Leaders are Betty Wu (b. 2780) and Jack Brock (b. 2776). Due to their similar voting records, the PDS and the Partido Unionista (PU) are generally seen as working closely together on issues. However, there is no evidence that they're close in any way, except their political views In 2819, inspired by the Unionist Party's name change to Partido Unionista, The Social Democratic Party Changed it's name to the name they bore in the first election, the Partido Democratico Social. In 2821, The PDS lost the largest party honor for the third time in its history. Party leadership blamed the constant agreement among the left-wing parties, which spreads out the votes among them. TYheir evidence is tha fact that in the runoff election for HOS, they won 56% to 44% against the LA |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | moderate unitarist | high | perfect |
Civil Rights | restrictive-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Ecology | skeptic-leaning | high | perfect |
Foreign Relations | internationalist-leaning | high | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | small government-leaning | high | perfect |
Market | moderate regulator | high | perfect |
Military | moderate pacifist | high | perfect |
Morality | moderate progressive | excellent | perfect |
Religion | secular-leaning | high | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
- International Secularist Society
- International Social Democrats
- World Peace Society
- Environmental Protection Organization
- International Civil Liberties Union
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
August 2800 | 172,605 | 46,045,892 | 0.37 | +0.37 | 0 | 77 | 0.00 | +0 |
August 2802 | 87,847,785 | 123,198,484 | 71.31 | +70.93 | 106 | 150 | 70.67 | +106 |
August 2804 | 89,084,222 | 174,743,168 | 50.98 | -20.33 | 74 | 150 | 49.33 | -32 |
August 2806 | 112,124,864 | 197,473,100 | 56.78 | +5.80 | 83 | 150 | 55.33 | +9 |
August 2808 | 136,936,447 | 243,689,791 | 56.19 | -0.59 | 84 | 150 | 56.00 | +1 |
August 2810 | 113,870,776 | 225,080,173 | 50.59 | -5.60 | 250 | 500 | 50.00 | +166 |
June 2811 | 117,372,824 | 229,477,355 | 51.15 | +0.56 | 255 | 505 | 50.50 | +5 |
June 2813 | 112,482,088 | 227,234,877 | 49.50 | -1.65 | 245 | 505 | 48.51 | -10 |
June 2815 | 94,924,355 | 233,821,526 | 40.60 | -8.90 | 197 | 505 | 39.01 | -48 |
June 2817 | 84,368,692 | 242,839,931 | 34.74 | -5.85 | 166 | 505 | 32.87 | -31 |
June 2819 | 81,635,669 | 257,632,407 | 31.69 | -3.06 | 149 | 505 | 29.50 | -17 |
June 2821 | 57,176,535 | 250,708,967 | 22.81 | -8.88 | 130 | 605 | 21.49 | -19 |
June 2823 | 46,397,025 | 250,965,153 | 18.49 | -4.32 | 103 | 605 | 17.02 | -27 |
June 2825 | 42,178,322 | 253,777,173 | 16.62 | -1.87 | 95 | 605 | 15.70 | -8 |
June 2827 | 55,455,086 | 268,666,796 | 20.64 | +4.02 | 118 | 605 | 19.50 | +23 |
June 2829 | 47,624,791 | 270,355,863 | 17.62 | -3.03 | 93 | 605 | 15.37 | -25 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Partido Democratico Social.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Defensive Use of Weapons Act 2095 | December 2095 | December 2095 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of September 2095 | October 2095 | October 2095 | passed | ||
Export of Firearms Act | September 2095 | September 2095 | passed | ||
Health and Safety Act | September 2095 | September 2095 | passed | ||
Ammended industry and subsidies to industrial operations Bill | August 2095 | August 2095 | passed | ||
Baltusia-Gaduridos Treaty | July 2095 | July 2095 | passed | ||
Industry and subsidies to industrial operations Bill 2094 | June 2095 | June 2095 | defeated | ||
Sales Tax Reform Act | April 2095 | April 2095 | passed | ||
Weapons of Mass Destruction Act | April 2095 | April 2095 | defeated | ||
Equality in Courtrooms Act | April 2095 | April 2095 | defeated | ||
Civil Defense Act 2093 | January 2094 | January 2094 | passed | ||
Foreign Aid to Increase Trade | January 2094 | January 2094 | passed | ||
Free Market, Free People | June 2093 | June 2093 | defeated | ||
Curfew for the Youth Act 2092 | April 2093 | April 2093 | passed | ||
Freedom to Pray Act | March 2093 | March 2093 | passed | ||
Affordable Telephone Service Act | September 2092 | September 2092 | passed | ||
Allowing Industrial Hemp 2091 | July 2092 | July 2092 | passed | ||
Prison Life Bill Compromise | April 2092 | April 2092 | defeated | ||
100 Deputies | April 2092 | April 2092 | defeated | ||
Malpractice Reform Act | April 2092 | April 2092 | passed |
Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |